Reflections on 50+ Years of Horse Breeding

Reflections on 50+ Years of Horse Breeding

Share this post

Reflections on 50+ Years of Horse Breeding
Reflections on 50+ Years of Horse Breeding
Federico Tesio: Breeding Racehorses Before Genetics Was a Word
Member Hub

Federico Tesio: Breeding Racehorses Before Genetics Was a Word

(And Doing It Better Than Most Do Now)

Jeanette Gower's avatar
Jeanette Gower
May 27, 2025
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

Reflections on 50+ Years of Horse Breeding
Reflections on 50+ Years of Horse Breeding
Federico Tesio: Breeding Racehorses Before Genetics Was a Word
Share

Long before gene mapping and genome sequencing, one Italian breeder did the impossible.

He bred champions not by chance, but by choice.

See this Tribute video:
At the end of this post is another video with an in-depth recording of his life’s work.

His name was Federico Tesio, and if you're breeding racehorses today, you're doing it in the shadow of his work, even if you’ve never heard his name.

Tesio wasn’t just a horseman. He was a theorist. A scientist without a lab coat. A man who made legends like Nearco, Ribot, and by extension, Northern Dancer and Mr. Prospector, without ever touching a DNA test.

Nearco exiting his bunker during WWII

So what exactly did Tesio believe? And why should today’s breeders still be paying attention?

What Did Tesio Actually Believe?

Tesio’s theories weren’t abstract. They were grounded in sweat, stopwatch data, and a relentless paper trail. He didn’t guess. He proved this through decades of hands-on breeding, ruthless selection, and borderline obsessive observation.

Here are the core pillars of his philosophy:

1. Prepotency Matters More Than Fashion

Tesio believed that the best breeding stock possessed prepotency—the ability to consistently pass on superior traits, regardless of the mate.

He wasn’t dazzled by stallions with good race records if they couldn’t stamp their foals.

“It is not the best horse who should be bred, but the one who breeds the best.”

📌 Modern Take: Still true. A flashy Group 1 stallion doesn’t mean much if he sires inconsistency. Tesio reminds us to focus on reproducible excellence, not flash-in-the-pan talent.


2. Blood Should Repeat Itself

Tesio leaned heavily on what he called "biological nicking"—not just sire/dam compatibility, but patterns within ancestry. He actively repeated names within pedigrees using inbreeding and linebreeding, but not blindly. He favored a technique we now call inbreeding to the dam line, believing it preserved female-originating athletic traits.

📌 Modern Take: Mitochondrial DNA is passed maternally—something Tesio couldn’t have known, but deeply understood in practice. His repeated use of strong maternal families shows a strategic grasp of what we now prove genetically.

This is part of a special section in the Member Hub. To read it in full, you can unlock a free trial.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Reflections on 50+ Years of Horse Breeding to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Jeanette Gower
Publisher Terms
Substack
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share